Comparative Analysis of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Expression between Two Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Subtypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is frequently diagnosed late and has poor survival. The two predominant subtypes of NSCLC, adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), are currently differentially diagnosed using immunohistochemical markers; however, they are increasingly recognized as very different cancer types suggestive of potential for new, more targeted therapies. There are extensive efforts to find more precise and noninvasive differential diagnostic tools. Here, we examined these two NSCLC subtypes for differences that may inform treatment and identify potential novel therapeutic pathways. We presented a comparative analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic expression in tumors from a cohort of 22 NSCLC patients: 8 LUSC and 14 LUAD. Comparing NSCLC subtypes, we found differential gene expression related to cell differentiation for LUSC and cellular structure and immune response regulation for LUAD. Differential protein expression between NSCLC subtypes was related to extracellular structure for LUSC and metabolic processes, including glucose metabolism for LUAD. This direct comparison was more informative about subtype-specific pathways than between each subtype and control (nontumor) tissues. Many of our observations between NSCLC subtypes support and inform existing observations and reveal differences that may aid research seeking to identify and validate novel subtype biomarkers or druggable targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".