MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406185459 · doi:10.1016/j.jobab.2025.01.001

Multifunctional biomass materials based on electroless plating

2025· article· en· W4406185459 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qi Zhang, Xiaohong Tang, Qian Zhao, Xianchun Chen, Ke Wang, Qin Zhang, Qiang Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioresources and Bioproducts · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSichuan Province Science and Technology Support ProgramMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)Electroless platingPlating (geology)Materials scienceBusinessNanotechnologyBiologyAgronomyElectroplating

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The multifunctional utilization of biomass materials represents an effective strategy to address global resource shortages, mitigate environmental challenges, and support sustainable human development. However, the inherent insulating properties of most natural biomass materials significantly limit their applicability in advanced electronic technologies, including electromagnetic shielding, electrode capacitors, and triboelectric generators. Electroless plating (ELP), a versatile technique for metallization and functionalization, has attracted considerable attention over the past decade for its potential to endow biomass materials with tailored properties. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of ELP technology in the development of multidimensional functionalized biomass materials, emphasizing surface chemistry and functional applications. It outlines the underlying principles and recent technological advancements of ELP, as well as the properties and applications of metallized biomass materials. By achieving an optimal balance between functionality and ease of fabrication, the ELP demonstrates significant potential to expand the applications of biomass materials across various domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bioresources and BioproductsSame topicElectrodeposition and Electroless CoatingsFrench-language works237,207