MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406195436 · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2024.12.199

Development of A Demand Model for School Trips in Colombo, Sri Lanka

2025· article· en· W4406195436 on OpenAlexfundno aff
KDP Damsara, Dimantha De Silva, R. M. N. T. Sirisoma

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation research procedia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of MoratuwaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsTransport Canada
KeywordsSri lankaTRIPS architectureTransport engineeringEngineeringSocioeconomicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

School trips share a significant portion of the traffic in peak hours in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Therefore, understanding the distribution of school trips among predefined origin and destination zones is important in managing school traffic. The applicability of the studies carried out in other countries to the Sri Lankan context is limited due to the socio-economic factors in the study area. This study mainly focused on identifying the distribution of home-to-school trips within Colombo, the capital district of Sri Lanka. A methodology is developed using home visit survey data to construct a travel O-D matrix for home-to-school trips attracted to the government schools located in the Colombo district, followed up by mathematical models to estimate the school trip distribution. The outcomes are presented using an O-D matrix for home-to-school trips followed by O-D desire lines. Further, the study uses multiple linear regression techniques to identify mathematical models to estimate the number of inter-zonal and intra-zonal school trips between origin-destination pairs in the study area. The mathematical models proposed in this research can be calibrated and used for other developing countries with similar school education systems for better estimations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation research procediaSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207