Design of an Underwater Acoustic Waveform and Integrated System for Communication and Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combining underwater communication and detection can reduce system size and power consumption as well as improve secrecy. This paper presents a waveform that integrates continuous phase modulation (CPM) for data communication with linear frequency modulation (LFM) for detection. It is shown that the velocity ambiguity and range performance with this waveform are similar to those with only LFM. An integrated underwater acoustic system is also proposed to achieve simultaneous communication and detection. A symbol suffix (SS) is introduced into the signal frame at the transmitter and a two-step algorithm is employed at the receiver for frequency and phase offset estimation. Results are presented, showing that this decreases the sensitivity to CPM and reduces the range ambiguity side lobes. Further, the proposed system can effectively recover the data from the received signal. The bit error rate (BER) is shown to be better than that of traditional systems without a symbol suffix. With changes in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the bit error rate (BER) in underwater acoustic environments is comparable to that in an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, indicating a significant improvement in communication performance within the underwater acoustic channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".