Protein Alterations in Patients with Delirium after Cardiac Surgery: An Exploratory Case–Control Substudy of the VISION Cardiac Surgery Biobank
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Delirium is an acute state of confusion associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. Delirium is diagnosed clinically using screening tools; most cases go undetected. Identifying a delirium biomarker would allow for accurate diagnosis, application of therapies, and insight into causal pathways. To agnostically discover novel biomarkers of delirium, a case-control substudy was conducted using the Vascular Events in Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Cardiac Surgery Biobank. The objective was to identify candidate biomarkers to investigate in future studies. METHODS: The study gathered a convenience sample of 30 patients with delirium on postoperative day 1 matched to 30 controls by age, sex, ethnicity, center, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. The Olink Explore 3K platform was used to identify blood protein alterations on postoperative day 3. Protein concentrations were expressed as normalized protein expression units (log 2 fold scale). Protein expression was compared between cases and controls using a paired t test and identified significantly different biomarkers based on a false discovery rate-adjusted P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: Of 2,865 unique serum proteins, 26 (0.9%) were significantly associated with delirium status; all were elevated in cases versus controls at a false discovery rate of less than 0.05. Pathway analysis identified calcium-release channel activity ( Padj = 0.02) and GTP-binding ( Padj = 0.005) functions as characteristic of proteins associated with delirium. The top three differentially expressed biomarkers were FKBP1B ( Padj = 0.003), C2CD2L ( Padj = 0.004), and RAB6B ( Padj = 0.004). The inflammatory biomarker interleukin-8 (CXCL8; mean difference = 2.36; P = 3.6 × 10- 4 ) was also associated with delirium. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified 26 biomarkers significantly associated with delirium; all are novel except for interleukin-8. An association between delirium and recognized neuroinflammatory proteins or markers of brain injury was not identifed, which supports using biomarkers to differentiate between delirium and other neurologic conditions. While exploratory, the study's findings support using biomarkers to diagnose postoperative delirium and validate using agnostic screens to identify potential delirium biomarkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".