MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406200478 · doi:10.1002/alz.088849

Postmortem MRI signature of Hippocampal Sclerosis of Aging

2024· article· en· W4406200478 on OpenAlexaff
Gustaf Rådman, Amanda E Denning, Sadhana Ravikumar, Nicola Spotorno, Ranjit Ittyerah, Lisa M Levorse, Madigan L. Bedard, Eunice Chung, John Robinson, Theresa Schuck, Eddie B Lee, Sydney Lim, Winifred Trotman, Alejandra Bahena, Rosanna K. Olsen, David J. Irwin, María del Mar Arroyo Jiménez, Alicia Vela, Esther Buendia, María M. Martín, Pilar Marcos, Mónica Muñoz, Ricardo Insausti, Paul A. Yushkevich, Laura E.M. Wisse

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal sclerosisHippocampal formationSignature (topology)MedicineNeurosciencePathologyMultiple sclerosisPsychologyTemporal lobeEpilepsyPsychiatryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Hippocampal Sclerosis of aging (HS) refers to age‐related selective neuronal loss and gliosis in hippocampal cornu ammonis 1 (CA1) and subiculum that is out of proportion to tau pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). HS is related to cognitive decline and memory impairments separately from other neurodegenerative pathologies. To date, in vivo imaging biomarkers of HS of aging are non‐existent, and their development would greatly improve diagnosis and prognosis in memory clinics. We therefore aimed to characterize the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signature of HS among autopsy confirmed cases of HS. Method Data consisted of same‐subject histological Nissl‐stained slices and postmortem MRI (0.2mm isotropic) acquired from 27 subjects at the University of Pennsylvania and University Castilla‐La Mancha. Based on neuropathological assessment, cases were grouped into HS (N = 5), intermediate to high AD neuropathologic change without HS (N = 10) and limited or no neuropathological burden (N = 12). We manually measured grey matter thickness and GM/WM intensity ratio in select locations across the hippocampal head, body, and tail. We also obtained more global structural measures from hippocampal subfields using an automated postmortem atlas‐based segmentation algorithm. Result Qualitatively, HS is clearly noticeable as cortical thinning and hypointense signal (approximating white matter) on postmortem MRI across the CA1 and subiculum, particularly anteriorly closer to the border between CA1/subiculum (Figure 1). Manual thickness measures showed complete separation between the HS group and the two reference groups across both the hippocampal head and body, and a less pronounced difference in the tail. Global structural measures from automated segmentations corroborated these group differences showing complete separation in CA1 thickness and significant differences in subiculum and the white matter layer of CA1 (Stratum Radiatum Lacunosum Moleculare, SRLM). Conclusion In MRI, HS is marked by hypointense voxels and cortical thinning across CA1 and subiculum. Both local manual thickness measurements and thickness measures of whole subfields derived from automatic segmentations provided promising results. As a next step, we plan to perform similar measurements on antemortem MRI of the same subjects, with the hopes of making progress toward an in vivo MRI biomarker of HS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→