MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406200932 · doi:10.1002/alz.093072

Inflammation in the white matter relates to core Alzheimer's disease pathophysiological processes

2024· article· en· W4406200932 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Ottoy, Min Su Kang, Eric Yin, Nesrine Rahmouni, Jenna Stevenson, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Kaj Blennow, Henrik Zetterberg, Nicholas J. Ashton, Serge Gauthier, Sandra E. Black, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Maged Goubran

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill Genome CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathophysiologyWhite matterInflammationDiseaseNeuroscienceMedicineCore (optical fiber)Alzheimer's diseasePsychologyPathologyImmunologyMagnetic resonance imagingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In‐vivo PET imaging studies have demonstrated neuroinflammation (microglia reactivity) in the neocortex of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. However, the extent and implication of microglia reactivity in white matter regions remains unclear. Here, we explored microglia reactivity in white matter using PET imaging of the translocator protein (TSPO) in relation to core AD biomarkers (amyloid, tau, and astrogliosis), microstructural damage, and cognitive decline. Method Ninety‐one participants from the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia cohort (45% Aβ‐positive, 39% cognitively impaired) underwent diffusion‐weighted MRI, TSPO‐PET (11C‐PBR28), amyloid‐PET (18F‐NAV4694), tau‐PET (18F‐MK6240), and plasma Aβ42/40, ptau181, ptau217, and ptau231. We investigated the associations of TSPO‐PET SUVR in white matter lobes (eroded by 2mm3) with each of the AD biomarkers, diffusion metrics, and cognition, adjusted for demographics and global cortical TSPO‐PET. Longitudinally, we investigated the interaction between time (up to 2y) and baseline white matter TSPO‐PET SUVR on cognitive decline, adjusted for demographics and cortical amyloid. Result White matter TSPO‐PET was increased globally with older age and frontally with male sex (p<0.05). In impaired individuals, TSPO‐PET was elevated in temporo‐occipital white matter regions compared to controls (p=0.01‐0.02). The occipital increases were associated with reactive astrogliosis (p=0.011) and higher‐Braak tau‐PET (p=0.003‐0.034 for Braak3‐4) and plasma ptau181 (p=0.014) (Figure 1A‐B), but not with Aβ, ptau231 or ptau217. In addition, higher occipital TSPO‐PET was associated with lower fibre integrity (fractional anisotropy, p=0.025) but not free water. Finally, in relation to cognition, higher occipital and parietal TSPO‐PET was significantly associated with impaired memory and language, respectively, independent of Aβ (Figure 1C). Longitudinally, within the same patient, higher white matter TSPO‐PET at baseline was significantly associated with favorable clinical outcome over time (Figure 1D). Conclusion Increased microglia reactivity (TSPO‐PET) in posterior white matter may indicate later‐stage AD associated with astrogliosis, tau, and dysfunction of the memory and language domains. Another novel finding is that individuals with higher white matter TSPO‐PET at baseline displayed better clinical prognosis over time. As such, assessing white matter inflammation could be promising to evaluate target engagement in clinical trials of anti‐inflammatory drugs and to subtype patients for better patient‐centric treatment outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicTryptophan and brain disorders→French-language works237,207→