Psoas Muscle Sarcopenia Predicts Brain Volume Loss on MRI in 7,149 Individuals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Sarcopenia has been linked to brain atrophy and there is lack of information on specific muscle groups that may contribute to this link. The psoas muscles are sensitive to sarcopenia and thus may sensitively relate to brain aging and Alzheimer disease risk. Method This study utilized 7,149 healthy individuals across four sites (Mean age 53.06 ± 12.95 years, age range 18‐97 years; 48% women; 52% men; 38% non‐white) were scanned on 1.5T MR machines with a whole‐body protocol. Whole body sequences included coronal T1 for segmentation of psoas muscle volumes. Deep learning with FastSurfer on 3D T1 volumetric MPRAGE trained on 134 participants aged 27‐66 segmented 96 brain regions. Partial correlation analysis was done on psoas muscle volumes and brain regions controlling for sex and total intracranial volume to determine if lower psoas muscle volumes correlated to brain atrophy. Multiple comparisons were accounted for using the Bonferroni Method. Result Lower psoas muscle volumes demonstrated a statistically partial correlation to lower gray matter (rp = ‐0.164, p = 2.66×10−43) and white matter volumes (rp = ‐0.171, p = 4.39×10−47). The frontal lobe exhibited a negative correlation (rp = ‐0.172, p = 1.30×10−47), identical to the temporal lobe (rp = ‐0.172, p = 1.21×10−47). Negative correlations were also noted in the parietal lobe (rp = ‐0.119, p = 8.72×10−23), and occipital lobe (rp = ‐0.139; p = 2.89×10−31). The hippocampus also showed a statistically significant negative correlation (rp = ‐0.145, p = 7.65×10−34), as did the posterior cingulate (rp = ‐0.162, p = 5.20×10−42) and the precuneus (rp = ‐0.101, p = 1.34×10−16). The cerebral ventricles showed a non‐significant negative correlation (rp = ‐0.025, p = 0.345). Conclusion We demonstrate a significant correlation between lower psoas muscle volume and brain volume loss, including AD risk regions such as the hippocampus and precuneus. These MRI findings underscore the importance of muscle health in relation to brain integrity. The volume of the psoas, which is involved in basic leg flexion activities such as walking, could be a crucial indicator of brain health and Alzheimer risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".