MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406201033 · doi:10.1002/alz.092554

Plasma GFAP use for population enrichment of clinical trials in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

2024· article· en· W4406201033 on OpenAlexaff
Bruna Bellaver, Guilherme Povala, Pâmela C.L. Ferreira, Guilherme Bauer‐Negrini, Firoza Z Lussier, Douglas Teixeira Leffa, João Pedro Ferrari‐Souza, Matheus Scarpatto Rodrigues, Carolina Soares, Markley Silva Oliveira, Nesrine Rahmouni, Cécile Tissot, Joseph Therriault, Stijn Servaes, Jenna Stevenson, Andréa L. Benedet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Rebecca E. Langhough, Tobey J. Betthauser, Bradley T. Christian, Rachael E. Wilson, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Dana Tudorascu, Eduardo R. Zimmer, Thomas K. Karikari, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Sterling C. Johnson, Tharick A. Pascoal

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseClinical trialAlzheimer's diseaseMedicinePopulationPsychologyOncologyInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background We showed that plasma GFAP (a proxy of astrocyte reactivity) abnormality is key to unleashing Aβ effects on tau phosphorylation in preclinical AD. This suggests that selecting cognitively unimpaired(CU) individuals with both high Aβ and plasma GFAP could offer an early time window in the disease, but with an increased risk of developing tau pathology. Here, we tested the utility of plasma GFAP for population enrichment in clinical trials focusing on CU individuals. Method We assessed 195 CU individuals from TRIAD (n=84) and WRAP (n=111) cohorts with plasma GFAP and Aβ‐PET at baseline and Tau‐PET ([18F]MK6240) at baseline and follow‐up. The annual rate of progression in Tau‐PET was measured as follow‐up minus baseline uptakes divided by time between scans. Aβ positivity was determined as Centiloid>20. Astrocyte reactivity positivity(Ast+) was defined based on plasma GFAP of younger Aβ‐. Effect size was calculated as the mean change in Tau‐PET divided by the SD. Estimated sample size was calculated testing a hypothesized 25%drug effect on tau accumulation reduction in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and temporal neocortex (Neo‐T) as secondary outcomes with 80% power at a 0.05 level. Results A significant annual rate of MTL tau‐PET accumulation was observed in both Aβ+/Ast‐ and Aβ+/Ast+ groups (Figure 1A), while Neo‐T Tau‐accumulated only in the Aβ+/Ast+ group (Figure 1B). The Aβ+/Ast+ group has a larger effect size on Neo‐T tau accumulation (0.97) compared to Aβ+/Ast‐ (0.33) and all individuals Aβ+ (0.61; Figure 2C). Plasma GFAP as an enrichment strategy reduced the sample size of clinical trials using changes in the Neo‐T as outcome in 60% (Figure 2D), with 59% reduction in clinical trial costs (Figure 3B). Plasma GFAP as an enrichment strategy for changes in MTL tau accumulation did not provide significant advantages over using Aβ only (Figure 2‐3). Larger effect sizes in Tau‐PET accumulation were observed in WRAP than TRIAD cohort. Conclusion The use of Aβ+/Ast+ for population enrichment would reduce up to 59% clinical trial costs aiming to detect changes in Tau‐PET compared to using Aβ only. To conclude, clinical trials focusing on preclinical AD would benefit from enrolling individuals with both Aβ pathology and astrocyte reactivity to select individuals enhancing trial cost‐effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.042
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0420.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.347
GPT teacher head0.517
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207