Validation of diffusivity along the perivascular space as a biomarker for vascular cognitive impairment and dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background To validate the index of diffusivity along the perivascular space (ALPS index) as a biomarker for vascular cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). Method The participants and MRI data used in this study were acquired as part of the MarkVCID consortium, which consisted of seven sites. A total of 578 participants (72.5±7.2 years old, 232 Male) who received baseline and follow‐up cognitive evaluations (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Principal Component Analysis derived General Cognitive Function (GCF_PCA), and composite score of Executive Function (EFC)) and MRI examinations were included in this study. The diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data were processed by using an in‐house automatic processing pipeline with FMRIB Software Library 6.0.6. The mean free water (mFW) and peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD) were computed in the white matter (WM). The ALPS index was defined as the average of bilateral ALPS indices which were calculated by the ratio of mean of x‐axis diffusivity in the projection fibers (Dxxproj) and x‐axis diffusivity in the association fibers (Dxxassoc) to the mean of y‐axis diffusivity in the projection fibers (Dyyproj) and z‐axis diffusivity in the association fibers (Dzzassoc). The WM hyperintensity volumes (WMHV) were calculated on FLAIR images and normalized by intracranial volume (ICV). Univariate correlation (Pearson or Spearman) was used to examine the associations between imaging markers (ALPS index, mFW, PSMD, and WMHV). Linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations of baseline ALPS index with baseline and longitudinal changes of cognitive outcomes, regressing out three types of covariates: 1) age, sex, and education, 2) added vascular risk factors (VRFs), including diabetes, hypertension and smoking, 3) further added mFW, PSMD and WMHV. SAS 9.4 software was used for all statistical analyses, and P<0.05 was regarded as statistical significance. Result The baseline ALPS index was significantly correlated with existing biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD)‐related VCID, i.e., mFW and WMHV (P<0.01) (Figure 1), and baseline cognitive performances, i.e., MoCA total score, GCF_PCA score, and EFC score (P<0.05) after adjusting for the demographics, VRFs, and existing biomarkers (Figure 2). Conclusion the ALPS index is an independent contributor to the cognitive decline in cSVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".