Late‐life hypertension acts together with amyloid‐β pathology to promote memory loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Midlife hypertension (HTN) is a known risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it remains to be elucidated whether the effect of late‐life HTN is also present. Here, we aimed to assess the associations of late‐life HTN and amyloid‐β pathology (Aβ) with longitudinal changes in global cognition and different domains in cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. Method We evaluated 475 CU individuals of over 65 years of age from the ADNI cohort, with available baseline medical data and CSF Elecsys biomarkers (Aβ1‐42 and p‐tau181), as well as longitudinal clinical assessments with neuropsychological testing (up to 6 years). We used global cognitive tests, as well as composite scores for memory, executive function and language domains as outcomes. We replicated all the analyses in 162 CU individuals of over 65 years of age from the TRIAD cohort with baseline clinical data and [18F]NAV4694 positron emission tomography (PET) for Aβ, as well as longitudinal clinical assessments with neuropsychological testing (up to 3 years). The presence or absence of HTN was defined based on medical history. In addition, individuals were classified as Aβ+ or Aβ‐ based on CSF p‐tau181/Aβ1‐42 (ADNI) or Aβ‐PET (TRIAD). Result Linear mixed‐effects (LME) models showed that HTN and Aβ acted together to promote longitudinal global cognitive decline (ADNI: HTN X Aβ X Time, β = ‐0.44, p = 0.001, Figure 1a; TRIAD: HTN X Aβ X Time, β =‐0.62, p = 0.001). Interestingly, additional analyses demonstrated that HTN and Aβ joint effects were observed on the decline of memory function (ADNI: HTN X Aβ X Time, β = ‐0.05, p = 0.012, Figure 1b; TRIAD: HTN X Aβ X Time, β = ‐0.64, p < 0.001), but not for executive function or and language (Figure 1c, ADNI: p = 0 .6767 and TRIAD: p = 0.797 and Figure 1d, ADNI: p = 0.8961 and TRIAD: p = 0.327, respectively). Conclusion In CU individuals at increased risk for AD, late‐life HTN confers increased risk for cognitive decline, particularly in memory function. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms involved and how treating hypertension in this population may mediate this risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".