The role of sex in the association between peripheral insulin and cortical thickness in cognitively intact older adults by amyloid status
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Compared to men, insulin‐resistant women have more brain atrophy, cognitive impairment, and higher dementia risk, but the mechanisms for this sex difference are unknown. We examined sex differences in how blood insulin relates to cortical thickness in cognitively intact older adults. Gaining a better understanding of the relationship between insulin and brain health could help inform the development of insulin‐targeting treatments and reduce the risk of dementia associated with insulin resistance. Method We performed MRI and florbetaben (amyloid PET) scanning and acquired fasting blood insulin on 1026 cognitively normal participants from the Health & Aging Brain Study – Health Disparities (50‐90 years; 645 female) (Table 1). Amyloid positivity (AB+) was defined as global SUVR>1.08, using a whole cerebellum reference region. We used linear regressions to relate blood insulin to cortical thickness in 34 mean bilateral Freesurfer‐derived brain regions and left and right hippocampal volume (FDR‐corrected for 36 regions). We additionally conducted separate linear regressions within each sex and tested for a sex*insulin interaction on cortical thickness and hippocampal volume. Covariates included age, sex, blood glucose levels, abdominal circumference, years of education, and income. Result In the full sample, higher insulin was associated with thicker superior parietal (β=0.11, p‐corrected=0.02), inferior parietal (β=0.10, p‐corrected=0.03) and lateral occipital cortex (β=0.12, p‐corrected=8.14e‐03). In women, but not men, higher insulin was associated with thicker cortex in several frontal, parietal, and occipital regions (Figure 1). A sex*insulin interaction on cortical thickness was significant in the pars triangularis (β=‐0.18, p‐corrected=0.04), lateral orbitofrontal (β=‐0.23, p‐corrected=6.80e‐03), superior parietal (β=‐0.17, p‐corrected=0.04), and inferior parietal cortex (β=‐0.18, p‐corrected=0.02), even after controlling for hypertension and cardiovascular disease presence, which differed between sexes. Higher insulin was associated with thicker cortex in several frontal and parietal regions in AB‐ but not AB+ women, with an amyloid status*insulin interaction in the pars orbitalis (β=‐0.42, p‐corrected=0.03). Conclusion Higher blood insulin correlates with thicker cortex in cognitively intact women, particularly those who are AB‐, but not in men. Future research on how sex hormones affect insulin signaling and the potential modulating role of amyloid could further our understanding of neurodegenerative processes and guide targeted interventions in dementia prevention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".