Association Between Baseline Plasma p‐tau181 Levels and Cognitive Trajectory in Healthy Geriatric Populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Dementia is a critical concern in the aging population, and understanding biomarkers associated with cognitive trajectories can provide valuable insights to improve diagnosis and intervention strategies. Method We conducted our study at a geriatric check‐up clinic at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, focusing on a healthy cohort of older adults aged 60 or older without dementia. This study included patients with available plasma p‐tau181 levels (Quanterix, Simoa) concurrent with cognitive evaluations no more than one year before the blood test, as well as at least one cognitive test administered after the blood test. The data collection period extended from March 2022 to January 2024. Cognitive evaluation was conducted using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with the total score and subsection MoCA scores serving as outcome measures. The data were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models, incorporating time from the blood test and plasma p‐tau181 level as fixed effects, with individual subjects considered as random effects. Result Among 52 healthy participants, the median age was 66.5 years (IQR: 65‐73), the median education was 16 years, and 80.8% were female. Baseline assessments showed a median MoCA score of 26 (IQR: 23‐27) (Table 1). The fixed‐effects model revealed a negative association between plasma p‐tau181 levels and MoCA total score (coefficient = ‐0.104) as well as memory subsection scores (coefficient = ‐0.101), although the findings were not statistically significant. In contrast, a significant positive association was observed between time and MoCA total score (coefficient = 0.003, p = 0.001) and memory subsection (coefficient = 0.002, p = 0.004) (Table 2). Conclusion The observed overall cognitive improvement over time in our study might imply a learning effect. Notably, among participants showing a positive correlation between time and cognitive performance, there is a trend towards lower cognitive function in those with elevated plasma p‐tau181. The lack of statistical significance in the association with plasma p‐tau181 may be attributed to small sample size and limited study duration. Our study suggests a potential association between plasma p‐tau181 and cognitive trajectories in a healthy geriatric population; however, future investigations with larger cohorts and extended follow‐up durations are necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".