The Passage of Chaperonins to Extracellular Locations in Legionella pneumophila Requires a Functional Dot/Icm System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HtpB, the chaperonin of the bacterial pathogen L. pneumophila, is found in extracellular locations, even the cytoplasm of host cells. Although chaperonins have an essential cytoplasmic function in protein folding, HtpB exits the cytoplasm to perform extracellular virulence-related functions that support L. pneumophila’s lifestyle. The mechanism by which HtpB reaches extracellular locations is not currently understood. To address this experimental gap, immunoelectron microscopy, trypsin-accessibility assays, and cell fractionation were used to localize HtpB in various L. pneumophila secretion mutants. Dot/Icm type IV secretion mutants displayed less surface-exposed HtpB and more periplasmic HtpB than parent strains. The analysis of periplasmic extracts and outer membrane vesicles of these mutants, where HtpB co-localized with bona fide periplasmic proteins, confirmed the elevated levels of periplasmic HtpB. Genetic complementation of the mutants recovered parent strain levels of surface-exposed and periplasmic HtpB. The export of GSK-tagged HtpB into the cytoplasm of infected cells was also Dot/Icm-dependent. The translocating role of the Dot/Icm system was not specific for HtpB because GroEL, the chaperonin of Escherichia coli, was found at the cell surface and accumulated in the periplasm of Dot mutants when expressed in L. pneumophila. These findings establish that a functional Dot/Icm system is required for HtpB to reach extracellular locations, but the mechanism by which cytoplasmic HtpB reaches the periplasm remains partially unidentified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".