Exercise reduces white matter pathology in vascular cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Subcortical ischemic vascular cognitive impairment (SIVCI) is highly prevalent in older individuals. White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a defining feature of SIVCI. There are sex differences in SIVCI, with females having higher volume and faster WMH progression than males. Resistance exercise training (RT) can slow WMH progression in cognitively unimpaired individuals; however, evidence in SIVCI is scarce. It is also unknown if biological sex influences WMH response to exercise. We investigated whether RT mitigated WMH in older individuals living with SIVCI and assessed whether biological sex moderated intervention effects. Methods This was a 12‐month single‐blind, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to RT (n = 45, females = 32) or a balance and tone (BAT) control group (n = 46, females = 29). Study eligibility included: 1) age 55 years and older; 2) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of cerebral small vessel disease; 3) mild cognitive impairment; and 4) absence of dementia. We measured WMH using a seed‐based pipeline incorporating T2‐ and PD‐weighted MRI scans. We extracted volumes for whole‐brain and lobe‐specific regions‐of‐interest. Differences between groups from baseline to 12 months were assessed via analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline WMH volume, estimated intracranial volume, and sex. We assessed sex‐specific effects via group‐by‐sex interaction terms. Results Seventy‐four participants (aged 74.3 [SD = 5.6], 65% females) completed follow‐up assessment and were included in the analysis. At 12 months, no main effect of intervention was observed for whole‐brain WMH volume (estimated mean difference [asinh‐transformed cm3]: ‐0.045, 95% CI: ‐0.124 to 0.034, p = 0.264). Biological sex significantly moderated intervention effects on whole‐brain WMH volume (p = 0.019), whereby RT reduced WMH volume (vs BAT controls) in females (‐0.113, 95% CI: ‐0.208 to ‐0.018, p = 0.021) but not males (0.081, 95% CI: ‐0.048 to 0.211, p = 0.216). Lobe‐specific analysis revealed that RT reduced WMH volume (vs BAT controls) in the parietal (‐0.074, 95% CI: ‐0.148 to ‐0.0004, p = 0.049) and temporal (‐0.069, 95%CI: ‐0.138 to ‐0.00003, p = 0.049) lobes. Group‐by‐sex interaction effects approached significance for parietal WMH volume (p = 0.052), suggesting an overall sex‐dependent effect of training. Conclusion RT may be an effective strategy to mitigate WMH progression in older individuals with SIVCI and females likely reap greater benefits than males.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".