MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406217776 · doi:10.1002/alz.091498

Cognitive, behavioral, and functional outcomes of suspected mild traumatic brain injury in community‐dwelling older persons without mild cognitive impairment or dementia

2024· article· en· W4406217776 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dylan X. Guan, Matthew E. Peters, G. Bruce Pike, Eric E. Smith, Zahinoor Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaCognitionTraumatic brain injuryCognitive impairmentPsychologyClinical psychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a risk factor for dementia and is linked to earlier age of onset. This study investigated whether later‐life changes in everyday cognition and behavior – risk markers of AD – could be observed in cognitively unimpaired older persons who sustained suspected mild TBI (smTBI) earlier in life and whether these cognitive and behavioral changes behavior mediated the link between smTBI and daily function. Method Data for 1274 participants from the Canadian Platform for Research Online to Investigate Health, Quality of Life, Cognition, Behaviour, Function, and Caregiving in Aging (CAN‐PROTECT) study were analyzed. A self‐reported brain injury screening questionnaire was used to determine smTBI. Outcomes were measured using the Everyday Cognition (ECog‐II) scale, MBI Checklist (MBI‐C), and Standard Assessment of Global Everyday Activities (SAGEA). SCD was operationalized based on a score of ≥2 (i.e., consistently a little or much worse) on any ECog‐II item. MBI+ status was defined by MBI‐C total scores ≥8. Age, sex, years of education, marital status, and ethnocultural origin were balanced across exposure groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Weighted logistic and negative binomial regressions were used to model smTBI (exposure) associations with SCD and MBI+ statuses, and ECog‐II and MBI‐C total scores, respectively. Result Sample characteristics are shown in Table 1. Sustaining smTBI throughout the life course was linked to a higher odds of participants reporting SCD or MBI, as well as higher ECog‐II or MBI‐C total scores [Table 2]. Finally, SCD partially mediated, whereas MBI+ fully mediated, the association between smTBI and SAGEA total scores; SCD and MBI+ statuses accounted for approximately 45% and 70% of the total effect, respectively [Table 3]. Conclusion Sustaining smTBI throughout the life course is linked to poorer cognition and behavior even in community‐dwelling older persons without MCI or dementia. Older persons with smTBI may benefit from early dementia risk assessment using tools that measure changes in cognition and behavior. Interventions for declining cognition and behavior may also be beneficial in this population to address functional impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→