Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) MRI as a biomarker for cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) related cognitive decline: Multi‐site validation in the MarkVCID Consortium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) related vascular contributions represent a major factor contributing to cognitive decline and dementia (VCID) in older adults. However, there has not been a validated biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of this condition. Recently, the US National Institute on Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) funded the MarkVCID Consortium to identify and validate clinical‐trial‐ready biomarkers for VCID. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) MRI is one of the selected biomarkers that underwent multi‐site testing in the Consortium. The present study aimed to report the relationship between CVR and cognitive function at independent sites, based on a pre‐specified hypothesis. Method CVR, the ability of cerebral small vessels to dilate upon stimulus, is thought to directly reflect physiological function of the brain microvasculature. Based on previous single‐site findings, the pre‐defined hypothesis was that CVR will be associated with the global cognitive function measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) after adjusting for age, sex, and education, and this association will be observed in data collected and analyzed at each individual site. A total of 264 older participants from three sites were included (Table 1). Each site performed an identical CVR MRI procedure using 5% CO2 inhalation, and a standardized clinical and cognitive evaluation. Multi‐linear regression analysis was conducted on a site‐by‐site basis to examine the pre‐defined hypothesis. Result Gray‐matter CVR showed a positive association with MoCA score after adjustment for age, sex, and education, in which participants with higher CVR had higher MoCA scores. This relationship was reproduced at each site (Fig.1, p<0.05 for each), confirming our pre‐specified hypothesis. In the secondary analysis of all data together, higher gray‐matter CVR was found to be significantly associated with better executive function measure of item response theory (IRT) score (ß = 2.87, p = 0.003). Conclusion The present study evaluated the relationship between CVR and cognition in a multi‐center setting. CVR was found to be positively associated with global cognitive function measured by the MoCA, which was shown to be reproducible across different sites with diverse cohorts. These findings support the utility of CVR as a biomarker in future clinical trials of SVD and VCID.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".