MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406223614 · doi:10.1002/alz.094588

Impact of regional MAPT, APOE, and Aβ on tau propagation in Alzheimer’s disease: Insights from a connectome‐based simulation model

2024· article· en· W4406223614 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Xiao, Olof Strandberg, Vincent Bazinet, Golia Shafiei, Hamid Behjat, Nicola Spotorno, Ruben Smith, Danielle van Westen, Sebastian Palmqvist, Niklas Mattsson, Erik Stomrud, Bratislav Mišić, Alain Dagher, Oskar Hansson, Jacob W. Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnectomeDiseaseNeuroscienceAlzheimer's diseaseTau proteinMedicinePsychologyFunctional connectivityInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Tau pathology, a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), is thought to spread cell‐to‐cell via axonal connections, beginning focally before expanding throughout the brain. This study uses computational models to investigate the interplay between network spread and regional vulnerability in influencing tau spread, focusing specifically on MAPT and APOE genes, and Aβ plaques. Method 66 regional (Desikan‐Killiany atlas) tau‐PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) values were extracted from participants in the Swedish BioFINDER‐2 study: 429 cognitively normal (CN), 91 subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 168 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 182 AD. Values were adjusted for mean choroid plexus signal and converted to tau‐positive probabilities using two‐component Gaussian mixture models. The Susceptible‐Infectious‐Recovered (SIR) model (Fig. 1A) was employed to simulate tau spread through brain networks measured using structural connectivity from young individuals. We examined the roles of MAPT, APOE, and Aβ in tau propagation by parameterizing them regionally to influence tau synthesis, clearance, spreading, or misfolding. Regional MAPT and APOE were extracted from Allen Brain Atlas, and Aβ from Aβ‐PET. Performance of both baseline models (connectivity‐only) and models incorporating regional biological information were evaluated based on their ability to reconstruct observed regional tau levels. Performance was evaluated across the whole sample and groups based on diagnosis, APOE e4 carriage and Aβ positivity. Result The SIR model recapitulates observed tau patterns, suggesting connectivity‐based propagation in early‐stage regions (Fig. 1B, C). Allowing regional MAPT to moderate normal tau synthesis improved the model fit overall, and for all groups except CN or Aβ‐ participants (Fig. 2,3). Regional APOE or Aβ information did not enhance the model performance overall (Fig. 2B, C). However, allowing regional APOE to moderate tau clearance showed better performance in APOE e4 carriers vs. non‐carriers, and allowing regional Aβ to moderate tau spread improved performance compared to baseline model among Aβ+ individuals (Fig. 3). Conclusion Our results suggest that brain connectivity explains early temporal lobe tau spread patterns, while regional intrinsic (MAPT) and disease‐related (Aβ) susceptibility may influence spread of tau into other regions at later stages. Future work will test other hypotheses of tau spread by refining this model with additional biological information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→