MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406224144 · doi:10.1002/alz.084521

Single ascending dose results from an ongoing Phase 1 study of mivelsiran (ALN‐APP), the first investigational RNA interference therapeutic targeting amyloid precursor protein for Alzheimer’s disease

2024· article· en· W4406224144 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Cohen, Simon Ducharme, Jared R. Brosch, Everard G.B. Vijverberg, Alexandre Sostelly, S Goteti, Lynn Farrugia, Andreja Avberšek, Cristin Kaspar, Catherine J. Mummery

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA interferenceAmyloid precursor proteinDiseaseMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseAmyloid (mycology)Amyloid βInvestigational DrugsCancer researchRNAOncologyBiologyInternal medicinePathologyGeneGeneticsClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mivelsiran (ALN‐APP) is an investigational, intrathecally administered RNA interference therapeutic designed to lower levels of amyloid‐β (Aβ) peptide, a key driver of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) pathogenesis, by reducing upstream production of amyloid precursor protein (APP). We report additional safety, pharmacodynamic, and biomarker data from the double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single ascending dose part of the ongoing mivelsiran Phase 1 study (NCT05231785). Method Patients with early‐onset AD (symptom onset <65 years of age, Clinical Dementia Rating global score 0.5 or 1.0, and Mini‐Mental State Examination score >20) were randomized to single intrathecal doses of mivelsiran (25mg, 50mg, or 75mg) or placebo and evaluated for 6 months (plus up to 6‐months follow‐up if needed to achieve washout). Primary endpoint was frequency of adverse events (AEs). Pharmacological effects of mivelsiran (secondary endpoints) and exploratory biomarkers of disease progression were also evaluated. Result As of November 16, 2023, 20 patients (mean [range] age, 61.3 [53–73] years; 60.0% male; 80.0% white) were randomized to mivelsiran or placebo in 25mg (N = 6, 2:1 randomization), 50mg (N = 8, 3:1), and 75mg (N = 6, 2:1) cohorts. In these pooled cohorts, AEs were reported in 19 patients (95.0%), all of mild or moderate severity (Table 1). One patient experienced two mild AEs that were considered both study drug and procedure related. No serious AEs or deaths occurred. Reductions from baseline in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) soluble APPα and APPβ levels were rapid and sustained through ongoing data capture (i.e., Month 6 with mivelsiran 50mg and Month 10 with mivelsiran 75mg; Table 2), and were accompanied by sustained reductions from baseline in CSF Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels available through Month 6 (Table 3). Safety and pharmacodynamic data of up to 6 months from additional mivelsiran dose cohorts will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion In this ongoing Phase 1 single ascending dose study, mivelsiran 50mg and 75mg were well tolerated and produced robust, durable reductions in CSF levels of soluble APP and downstream Aβ42 and Aβ40, key proteins implicated in progression of AD and CAA. These interim results support further evaluation of mivelsiran in patients with AD or CAA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207