MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406224623 · doi:10.1002/alz.089735

All‐cause mortality among veterans with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s dementia who have Intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage

2024· article· en· W4406224623 on OpenAlexaff
Byron J. Aguilar, Ying Wang, Vanesa Carlota Andreu Arasa, Dan R. Berlowitz, Brant Mittler, Peter J. Morin, Joel I. Reisman, Myriam Abdennadher, Henry Querfurth, Raymond Zhang, Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Quanwu Zhang, Weiming Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubarachnoid hemorrhageIntracerebral hemorrhageDementiaCognitive impairmentMedicineCognitionPsychiatryAnesthesiaInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a significant contributor to hemorrhagic stroke, notably lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), both of which have been observed in patients with MCI/AD. To evaluate all‐cause mortality among veterans with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s dementia (AD) with/without Intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage (ICH/SAH) in the United States (US) Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VAHS). Method Veterans with MCI or AD were identified based on having clinical notes or diagnostic codes in the VAHS database (2010‐2019). ICH and SAH were identified with ICD‐10 codes I61.x and I60.x, respectively. Survival curves were generated, and Poisson regression was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. Result A total of 853,791 veterans with MCI/AD were included, with a mean age of 74 years, of which 96% were male, 5% Hispanic, 15% Black, and 74% White; 32% had MCI and 68% had AD. Approximately 0.6% of the overall sample had ICH/SAH. The observed mortality rates per 1000 person‐years were 130 for males and 60 for females and 138 for AD vs 102 for MCI. Mortality rates for Veterans with MCI/AD with and without ICH was 102 and 127, and with and without SAH was 83 and 127, respectively. Kaplan‐Meier curves showed a higher survival probability for Veterans with ICH/SAH events vs those without the events (P<0.01) and for AD vs MCI (P< 0.01; Figure). The mortality risk was lower for MCI than AD overall (IRR = 0.83, P< 0.01). The death rate in veterans with MCI/AD was statistically significantly lower for those with vs without ICH/SAH even after adjustment (IRR = 0.85, p<0.01). Death rate was higher in non‐Hispanic vs Hispanic (IRR = 1.23, P<0.01) and for White vs Black veterans (IRR = 1.05, P<0.01). Conclusion In US VAHS, AD was associated with an increased risk of death than MCI; ICH/SAH did not increase mortality risk. After adjustment, mortality rates were found to be 23% higher for non‐Hispanic vs Hispanic groups and 5% higher for White vs Black groups. Those findings will be further examined by incorporating Medicare data for Veterans who had dual eligibility for both VA and Medicare coverage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→