MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406225140 · doi:10.1002/alz.094153

Leveraging T1 MRI Images for Amyloid Status Prediction in Diverse Cognitive Conditions Using Advanced Deep Learning Models

2024· article· en· W4406225140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Seyyed Ali Hosseini, Stijn Servaes, Nesrine Rahmouni, Joseph Therriault, Cécile Tissot, Arthur C. Macedo, Jaime Fernández Arias, Kely Monica Quispialaya Socualaya, Yansheng Zheng, Tevy Chan, Lydia Trudel, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningCognitionArtificial intelligenceNeuroimagingComputer scienceMagnetic resonance imagingAmyloid (mycology)Machine learningPsychologyNeuroscienceMedicinePathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Timely and non‐invasive prediction of amyloid status are pivotal in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnostics. This research leverages T1 MRI images to predict amyloid positivity or negativity, offering an economical and less invasive alternative to amyloid PET scans. Using the comprehensive TRAID dataset from McGill University, the study evaluates a spectrum of cognitive conditions including AD, atypical AD, Cognitively Normal (CN), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), MCI not due to AD, Suspected Non‐Alzheimer’s Pathophysiology (SNAP), and Vascular MCI (VMCI). Method The study involved 588 subjects, representing a cross‐section of cognitive states. A VGG16‐based feature extraction process was meticulously applied to T1 MRI images to capture complex biomarkers of AD. These high‐dimensional features, alongside demographic data, were harnessed to train two deep learning models: a Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM) model and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) ensemble model. To prevent overfitting and data leakage, the models employ 10‐fold StratifiedKFold validation and early stopping, alongside regularization techniques like dropout and batch normalization. Data preprocessing is contained within StratifiedKFolds, and an independent test set is used for unbiased evaluation. The predictive accuracy was scrutinized using a range of metrics, including accuracy, F1‐score, recall, precision, and ROC AUC on the validation sets. Result The LSTM model reported average validation metrics with an accuracy of 70.88%, F1‐score of 70.64%, recall of 78.07%, precision of 70.88%, and a ROC AUC of 71.86%. The CNN ensemble model showed a marked improvement, particularly in its recall of 88.00% and ROC AUC of 82.47%, alongside an accuracy of 76.27% and F1‐score of 75.86% (Figure 1 and 2). However, in another model, it was the CNN ensemble model that demonstrated remarkable predictive power, achieving an ROC AUC of 88% within the AD spectrum (CN, MCI, and AD subjects), indicating a high degree of predictive power in classifying amyloid status. Conclusion This study underscores the CNN ensemble model’s robustness in predicting amyloid status across a broad spectrum of cognitive conditions, with particular emphasis on its application in high‐sensitivity clinical settings. These findings represent a significant advancement in the field of AD diagnostics, contributing to the development of more accessible and cost‐effective prognostic techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207