MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406236155 · doi:10.53771/ijstra.2022.3.1.0068

Improving cybersecurity readiness with a maturity framework for organizations in U.S. and Canada

2022· article· en· W4406236155 on OpenAlex
Gideon Opeyemi Babatunde, Olukunle Oladipupo Amoo, Sikirat Damilola Mustapha, Adebimpe Bolatito Ige

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Science and Technology Research Archive · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaturity (psychological)Computer securityCapability Maturity ModelBusinessProcess managementPolitical scienceComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing frequency and sophistication of cyber threats have underscored the need for enhanced cybersecurity readiness among organizations in the U.S. and Canada. To address this need, this paper introduces a Cybersecurity Maturity Framework (CMF) designed to assist organizations in systematically assessing and improving their cybersecurity capabilities. The framework provides a structured approach for evaluating current security postures, identifying gaps, and prioritizing investments to mitigate risks effectively. The proposed CMF consists of five maturity levels: Initial, Developing, Established, Advanced, and Optimized. Each level encompasses critical domains, including governance, threat intelligence, incident response, and workforce development, with defined benchmarks to measure progress. By incorporating best practices from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework and Canada's Cyber Security Strategy, the CMF ensures alignment with regional regulatory requirements and industry standards. A key feature of the framework is its adaptability to organizations of various sizes and sectors. The CMF integrates advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for threat detection and predictive analytics while emphasizing the importance of human factors, including continuous employee training and leadership engagement. Moreover, the framework promotes collaboration between public and private sectors to facilitate information sharing and collective defense against evolving cyber threats. Through case studies, the application of the CMF is demonstrated in enhancing cybersecurity readiness for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and large organizations in critical sectors such as healthcare, finance, and energy. Results indicate improved incident detection rates, faster response times, and strengthened resilience against sophisticated cyberattacks. This research highlights the necessity of adopting a maturity-based approach to cybersecurity, ensuring organizations can evolve their capabilities to counter dynamic threats. The Cybersecurity Maturity Framework provides a roadmap for sustainable improvement, empowering organizations in the U.S. and Canada to achieve a higher state of preparedness and resilience in the face of an ever-changing cyber threat landscape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it