Clinical and Electromyographic Characteristics of Pediatric Laryngeal Dyskinesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the clinical and laryngeal electromyographic (LEMG) parameters of children with laryngeal dyskinesia (LD) and its prevalence among laryngeal mobility disorder (LMD) requiring full airway examination. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective uncontrolled study. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric center. METHODS: Eligible children (<17 years old) were stridulous patients suspected of LMD (16 years period). We included those diagnosed with LD according to previously described criteria by Denoyelle et al, followed up for at least 3 months, who were assessed endoscopically and LEMG. PRIMARY OUTCOME: LEMG scores, and the prevalence of LD in all LMD who required airway exam under anesthesia. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: clinical resolution, McGill scores, and instrumental swallowing test. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (<17 years) were identified. Of these, 29 were included (25 boys; median age: 9.83 months [0.42-116.58]). LD constituted 18.58% of all patients during the study period. Asymmetry of movement and LEMG between the 2 sides was noted (the right side was more affected). Seventeen had swallowing difficulties (13 abnormal instrumental tests), and 27 snored (mean McGill score 3). The median follow up was 49.96 months (range: 5.25-243.25). Symptoms improved in all patients, but one, by the last follow-up date. CONCLUSION: LD is prevalent among LMD and is mostly self-limiting. We noted asymmetry of LEMG grades between the 2 sides of the larynx, male predominance, and functional deficits in sleep and swallowing. The diagnosis requires a complete endoscopic exam with LEMG. Conflating this entity with bilateral laryngeal paralysis has likely impacted the documented epidemiology and natural history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".