MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406247568 · doi:10.18280/ts.410642

Design of a Predictive Modeling System for MRI Brain Image Classification

2024· article· en· W4406247568 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
G. Sriram, R. Praveena

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An accurate identification and characterization of any potential abnormalities in the MRI brain image is required for efficient classification of brain cancer.Recent advancements by computerized diagnosis eradicate the possibility of radiologists making an incorrect diagnosis based on their skills to perceive and interpret data.This work proposed an efficient deep learning based Predictive Modeling System for Brain Cancer Classification (PMS-BCC).It consists of three modules: feature extraction module, feature selection module and classification module.To localize the patterns for brain cancer, PMS-BCC uses stacked convolution and pooling layers along with random skip connections.The main advantage of using this combination is that it allows the model to learn hierarchical and spatially invariant features efficiently, while also addressing common issues like vanishing gradients and overfitting.In the feature extraction module, the convolution layer is responsible for the extraction of locally relevant features, while the pooling layers minimize the feature dimension.In the subsequent module, an AntLion Optimization (ALO) is used to choose the optimal subset of features, and a neural network using Greedy Layerwise Training (GLT) is used in the classification module to do the classification.The gradient based optimization techniques suffer from local minima.ALO does not depend on gradients and can explore search space more effectively to avoid local minima compared to gradient based techniques and its variations.ALO has a better exploitation-exploration balance due to its specific hunting strategy than other metaheuristic algorithms.Results showed that the proposed PMS-BCC architecture with GLT improves the classification accuracy from 93.1% (convention training) to 98.6% for binary classification (normal/abnormal) and 93% (conventional training) to 98.2% for multiclass (normal/low-grade/high-grade) classification of MRI brain images obtained from REpository of Molecular BRAin Neoplasia DaTa (REMBRANDT) database.Though the proposed PMS-BCC system provides promising results, only the axial views of brain in the REMBRANDT database is used for the analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207