MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406253553 · doi:10.5194/tc-19-83-2025

Updated Arctic melt pond fraction dataset and trends 2002–2023 using ENVISAT and Sentinel-3 remote sensing data

2025· article· en· W4406253553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Larysa Istomina, Hannah Niehaus, Gunnar Spreen

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œcryosphere · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon 2020Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsArcticFraction (chemistry)Remote sensingEnvironmental scienceThe arcticGeologyOceanographyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Melt ponds on Arctic sea ice affect the radiative balance of the region as they introduce darkening of the sea ice during the Arctic summer. The temporal extent and spatial extent of the ponding, as well as its amplitude, reflect the state of Arctic sea ice and are important for our understanding of Arctic sea ice change. Remote sensing retrievals of melt pond fraction (MPF) provide information on both the present state of the melt pond development and its change throughout the years, which is valuable information in the context of climate change and Arctic amplification. In this work, we transfer the earlier published Melt Pond Detector (MPD) remote sensing retrieval to the Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) data on board the Sentinel-3 satellite and so complement the existing Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) MPF dataset (2002–2011) from Environmental Satellite (ENVISAT) with recent data (2017–present). To evaluate the bias of the MPF product, comparisons to Sentinel-2 MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) high-resolution satellite imagery are presented, in addition to earlier published validation studies. Both MERIS and OLCI MPD tend to overestimate the small MPFs (ranging from 0 to 0.2), which can be attributed to the presence of water-saturated snow and sea ice before onset of ponding. Good agreement for the middle-range MPF (0.2–0.8) is observed, and the areas of exceptionally high MPF = 100 % are recognized as well. The earlier published MERIS MPFs (2002–2011) were reprocessed using an improved cloud clearing routine and together with recent Sentinel-3 data provide an internally consistent dataset, which allows the MPF development in the past 20 years to be analyzed. Although the total summer hemispheric MPF trend is moderate, at +0.75 % per decade, the regional weekly MPF trends display a pronounced dynamic and range from −10 % to as high as +20 % per decade, depending on the region. We conclude the following effects: The global Arctic melt onset shifted towards spring by at least 2 weeks, with the melt onset happening in late May in recent years as compared to early June to mid-June in the beginning of the dataset. There has been a change in the pond onset regime in recent years, with the East Siberian and Laptev Sea dominating the melt onset and not the Beaufort Gyre region as before. The central Arctic, north Greenland and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (CAA) have shown signs of increasing first-year ice (FYI) fraction in recent years. The daily gridded MPF averages are available on the web page of the Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, as a historic dataset for the ENVISAT data and as ongoing operational processing for the Sentinel-3 data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œcryosphereSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207