MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406255440 · doi:10.1002/chem.202404458

Exploring the Metal‐Centered Reactivity of Isomeric, <i>N</i>‐Bridged Biscyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes

2025· article· en· W4406255440 on OpenAlexafffund
Gunwant K. Matharu, Miguel A. Soto, Francesco Lelj, Mark J. MacLachlan

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsArylPlatinumChemistryReactivity (psychology)IntermetallicMetalPlatinum groupCrystallographyTransition metalMoleculeStereochemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The field of platinum chemistry is ubiquitous in the research of anticancer drugs and new OLED materials. Within the vast library of existing compounds, the majority of work focuses on complexes in the +2 and +4 oxidation states, with comparatively few examples of Pt III complexes reported without bridging ligands. Pt III complexes with metal‐metal bonding can be made by mild oxidation of Pt II complexes having bis(phenylpyridine) ligands. Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of two new Pt II complexes bearing tetradentate N ‐bridged bis(phenylpyridine) ligands with N^C*C^N and C^N*N^C coordinating atoms. Through chemical oxidation with PhICl 2 and N ‐chlorosuccinimide, we obtained four new complexes containing Pt IV and Pt III centres. The dynamics of the Pt III complexes were explored by variable‐temperature NMR studies and showed surprisingly free rotation of the appended N ‐aryl group. This work uncovers the importance of the destabilizing nature of the bulky N ‐aryl group on intermetallic bonds, and sheds light on how the molecular rotation observed in the Pt III compounds could inspire new molecular rotors driven by intermetallic bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry - A European JournalSame topicMagnetism in coordination complexesFrench-language works237,207