Efficient Assignment with Time Constraints for Heterogeneous DSP Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-level synthesis (HLS) produces hardware au-tomatically by scheduling and assigning resources based on an input control/data-flow graph. One particular aspect of HLS for the digital signal processing (DSP) architecture is the het-erogeneous assignment problem (HAP) which maps operations into different types of functional units available in the electronic design automation tools to build efficient implementations. An optimal solution to this assignment problem can be found by formulating the problem as integer linear programming (ILP) and using a solver. However, given the slow nature of this process, heuristics tend to be used instead leading to sub-optimal designs. This paper revisits the classical ILP formulation of the HAP with time constraints for the DSP architecture by identifying redundant constraints. This paper proves theoretically, and demonstrates experimentally, that removing these constraints does not affect the obtained solution. This technique achieves speedups of more than 100 × in terms of runtime and reductions of more than 50 × in terms of memory usage of the solver. Also, this work proposes an updated heuristic that keeps reducing the latency of a path instead of finding a new critical path after giving a new node assignment. Runtime reductions (more than another 10×) due to reduced numbers of critical path searches are observed while returning similar results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".