MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PPO-Based Energy Efficiency Maximization For RIS-Assisted Multi-User Miso Systems

2024· article· en· W4406267429 on OpenAlexafffund
Amjad Iqbal, Ala’a Al-Habashna, Gabriel Wainer, Gary Boudreau, Faouzi Bouali

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Carleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaximizationComputer scienceEfficient energy useDistributed computingMathematical optimizationEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we explore the integration of a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) with a multi-antenna base station (BS) for downlink multi-user multiple-input-single-output (MU-MISO) systems. We aim to enhance energy efficiency (EE) by jointly optimizing beamforming and phase shifts at the BS and RIS, respectively, while ensuring each mobile user meets their link budget requirements. The resulting optimization problem is inherently non-convex. To address this challenge, we employ proximal policy optimization (PPO), known for efficiently managing non-convex problems and reducing training overhead in continuous action spaces through a clip factor. Furthermore, by leveraging deep neural networks (DNN), the proposed PPO-based solution provides the optimum values for the beamforming at the BS and the phase shift at the RIS, respectively. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed PPO-based algorithm through an extensive simulation campaign, comparing its performance against baseline methods (i.e., fractional programming (FP) and deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG)). The results show that our proposed PPO-based algorithm outperforms the considered baseline approaches (i.e., FP and DDPG) in terms of EE by 34.2% and 15.8%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207