Safety and efficacy of valoctocogene roxaparvovec with prophylactic glucocorticoids: 1-year results from the phase 3b, single-arm, open-label GENEr8-3 study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Valoctocogene roxaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus vector that transfers a human factor (F)VIII (FVIII) coding sequence to hepatocytes, provides bleeding protection for people with severe hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: Determine the efficacy and safety of valoctocogene roxaparvovec with concomitant prophylactic glucocorticoids in the open-label, single-arm, phase 3b GENEr8-3 trial. METHODS: vg/kg infusion of valoctocogene roxaparvovec concomitantly with daily prophylactic glucocorticoids (40 mg prednisolone equivalent/d weeks 0-8; taper to 5 mg/d weeks 9-19). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in FVIII activity (chromogenic substrate assay) at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints included annualized rate of FVIII use and annualized bleeding rate for treated bleeds. Safety was assessed by adverse events (AEs). Analysis populations were intent-to-treat (ITT; received valoctocogene roxaparvovec) for safety analyses and modified ITT (≥52 FVIII infusions in the year before dosing) for efficacy analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 22 participants with severe hemophilia A received valoctocogene roxaparvovec. In the modified ITT population (n = 21), mean week 52 FVIII activity increased from baseline (imputed as 1 IU/dL) to 16.1 IU/dL (SD, 22.4; P = .0057); posthemophilia A prophylaxis, mean treated annualized bleeding rate and mean annualized FVIII use decreased 67.1% and 91.6% from baseline, respectively (P < .05). The most common AE was alanine aminotransferase elevation (20/22 participants). Glucocorticoid-related AEs occurred in 19 of 22 participants. No participants discontinued the study. CONCLUSION: Based on cross-trial comparisons, prophylactic glucocorticoids do not confer safety or efficacy benefits compared with reactive glucocorticoid regimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".