MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406272481 · doi:10.1080/07373937.2025.2450700

Online detection of potato drying stages based on improved YOLOv7-tiny model

2025· article· en· W4406272481 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Supply Chain Traceability
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
FundersTianjin Municipal Education Commission
KeywordsProcess (computing)Computer scienceFeature (linguistics)Identification (biology)Artificial intelligenceProduct (mathematics)Process engineeringPattern recognition (psychology)Agricultural engineeringMachine learningMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To realize accurate online identification of different stages of the agricultural product drying process and overcome the limitations of empirical models, this study proposes a method for online identification of agricultural product drying stages based on machine vision, which enhances the YOLOv7-tiny model by adding an attention mechanism module to the feature layer and the up-adoption process. The recognition results were compared and evaluated with those of other versions of YOLO, Faster R-CNN, SSD, EfficientDet, and an unimproved YOLOv7-tiny network. The results showed that the average recognition accuracy of this method for the constant drying stage, first drying stage deceleration and second drying stage deceleration of potato slices reached 98.8%, which was superior to that of the model without the attentional mechanism module. This lays the foundation for the establishment of an on-line adaptive drying model for agricultural products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it