MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Repeatability of critical thermal maximum (CTmax) in two freshwater ectotherms across contexts

2025· article· en· W4406277819 on OpenAlexafffund
Samuel D Chasse, Erin Stewart, Graham D. Raby

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEctothermCritical thermal maximumRepeatabilityEnvironmental scienceClimate changeBiologyEcologyStatisticsMathematicsAcclimatization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Critical thermal maximum (CT max ) is the most widely used method for quantifying acute upper thermal limits in ectotherms. CT max protocol exposes animals to a consistent rate of environmental warming until they lose motor function. CT max has been used to assess intraspecific variation among life stages, populations, or as a function of body size, often with the assumption that it is a durable and heritable trait at the individual level. The existence of within-individual repeatability of CT max has been used to infer the potential for thermal adaptation via the positive correlation between the repeatability of a trait and its heritability. However, for how widely used CT max has become, surprisingly few studies have quantified within-individual repeatability in aquatic ectotherms, and none have assessed repeatability across contexts. We examined the cross-context repeatability of CT max in two freshwater ectotherms (one decapod crustacean and one teleost fish): rusty crayfish Faxonius rusticus (n = 31) and pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus (n = 38). Individual repeatability was measured on a weekly basis across multiple trials (n = 5 pumpkinseed CT max measurements, n = 7 rusty crayfish) that varied in acclimation temperature, oxygen saturation, and salinity. CT max was most strongly influenced by acclimation temperature. Repeatability varied based on the statistical approach and between the two species. Pumpkinseed repeatability across contexts was moderate ( ca. 0.4), similar to previous reports on within-context CT max repeatability studies in fishes. In rusty crayfish, repeatability was much lower ( ca . 0.16). This suggests CT max repeatability may be both taxon- and context-dependent, thus further investigation into repeatability is needed across species for this important and widely used trait. • Repeatability of upper thermal tolerance was taxon- and context-dependent • Pumpkinseed repeatability across contexts was moderate • Crayfish repeatability across contexts was low • Repeatability differed based on statistical approach • Acclimation temperature drove changes in tolerance among treatments for both species

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermal BiologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207