BK Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy – diagnostic and treatment standard
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is recognized as a significant viral complication of kidney transplantation. Prompt immunosuppression reduction reduces early graft failure rates due to BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN), however, modulation of immunosuppression can lead to acute rejection. Medium-to-long-term graft outcomes are negatively affected by BKPyVAN, probably due to a combination of virus-induced graft damage and host immune responses against graft alloantigens potentiated by immunosuppression reduction. Kidney biopsy remains the gold-standard diagnostic test, however, false-negative findings are common due to the focal nature of BKPyVAN. BKPyV DNAemia, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, is established as a screening test but there is at present no (inter)national standardization of these assays to allow collation and comparison of data between centres. Randomized controlled trials are lacking both in terms of optimal immunosuppression reduction strategies, and for the medications variably used to attempt treatment in clinical practice. Much of the fundamental biology of BKPyV is not yet understood, and further elucidation is required to promote rational direct-acting antiviral drug design. Insights into the role of adaptive immunity in control of BKPyV have informed the design of novel treatments such as adoptive immunotherapies and neutralizing antibodies that require evaluation in clinical studies. Here, we review the current standards of diagnosis and treatment of BKPyVAN and discuss novel developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, outcome prediction, and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".