(2940-2941) Proposals to conserve the name Amanita fulva with a conserved type against Agaricus badius and Agaricus trilobus, and the name Amanita spadicea with a conserved type (Basidiomycota)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(2940) Amanita fulva Fr., Observ. Мycol. 1: 2. 1815, nom. cons. prop.Typus: Germany, Bavaria, Kohlstadt, near Viehhausen, under Picea abies, 20 Jul 2007, Bresinsky (REG No. 26483). MBT 10010486, typ. cons. prop.(=) Agaricus badius Schaeff., Fung. Bavar. Palat. Nasc. 4: 63. Apr–Dec 1774, nom. rej. prop.Lectotypus (hic designatus): [icon in] Schaeffer, Fung. Bavar. Palat. Nasc.: t. CCXLV. Sep–Oct 1771. MBT 10008684. Epitypus (hic designatus): Italy, Bologna, Vidiciatico, Rio Ri, under Fagus sylvatica, Abies alba and Picea abies, 26 Aug 1992, Consiglio & Spisni GC99172 (AMB No. 19304). MBT 10010660.(=) Agaricus trilobus Bolton, Hist. Fung. Halifax: 38. Mai 1788, nom. rej. prop.Lectotypus (hic designatus): [icon in] Bolton, Hist. Fung. Halifax: t. XXXVIII, fig. 2. Mai 1788. MBT 10010719. Epitypus (hic designatus): Great Britain, Scotland, Carrbridge, Sluggan Bridge, in open Betula pendula and Pinus sylvestris woodland, 28 Aug 2022, Kibby & Tortelli (K(M) 001435713). MBT 10011768.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".