MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406285119 · doi:10.12968/jowc.2022.0095

Effects of adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy and real-time fluorescent imaging on deep sternal wound infection: a retrospective study

2025· article· en· W4406285119 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tse-Hsi Li, Cheng-Hsin Lin, Chung‐Kan Peng, Yichun Wu, Tsung‐Cheng Hsieh, Chi-Hung Lee, Yung-Ching Liu, Kun-Lun Huang, Ka‐Wai Tam, Shun‐Cheng Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wound Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical site infection prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteomyelitisSurgeryDebridement (dental)Retrospective cohort studyNegative-pressure wound therapyComplicationAntibioticsWound careHyperbaric oxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a rare but devastating complication that is estimated to occur in 1-2% of patients after median sternotomy. Current standard of care (SoC) comprises antibiotics, debridement and negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) appears to be an effective adjuvant therapy for osteomyelitis. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of HBOT and real-time fluorescence imaging (RTFI) in a DSWI treatment protocol and their benefits on infection control. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of DSWI management was performed. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups: HBOT group and RTFI group. Patients in the HBOT group received SoC, HBOT, NPWT and reconstructive flap surgery. Patients in the RTFI group received the same therapeutic plan as well as treatment with a RTFI device (MolecuLight i:X (MolecuLight, Inc., Canada) to achieve high-quality debridement. Infection status and short-term outcomes within three months were measured. Long-term outcomes were analysed at a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients enrolled: 22 in the HBOT group and 33 in the RTFI group. Infection control status, evaluated in terms of white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels, antibiotic use duration, antibiotic costs, reinfection rate and osteomyelitis recurrence rate, were statistically significantly improved in the RTFI group (<0.001, <0.001, 0.042, 0.022, 0.049 and 0.022, respectively). Length of total intensive care unit stay and duration of complete healing were statistically significantly decreased in the RTFI group (<0.001 and 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with DSWI can benefit from HBOT, especially in terms of in-hospital mortality. RTFI can be used to eliminate bacterial burden and achieve high-quality debridement, which considerably improves infection control and clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wound CareSame topicSurgical site infection preventionFrench-language works237,207