MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406288621 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf005

Low serum serotonin is associated with functional decline, mild behavioural impairment and brain atrophy in dementia-free subjects

2024· article· en· W4406288621 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ming Ann Sim, Yingqi Liao, Siew Pang Chan, Eugene S.J. Tan, Cheuk Ni Kan, Joyce R. Chong, Yuek Ling Chai, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Boon Yeow Tan, Saima Hilal, Xin Xu, Christopher Chen, Mitchell K.P. Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilNational University Health SystemNational University of Singapore
KeywordsDementiaAtrophySerotoninMedicineFunctional impairmentNeuroscienceCognitive impairmentPsychologyInternal medicineAudiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain serotonin dysregulation is associated with dementia and neuropsychiatric symptomology. However, the prognostic utility of circulating serotonin levels in detecting features of prodromal dementia including functional decline, cognitive impairment, mild behavioural impairment and brain atrophy remains unclear. In this prospective study of memory clinic subjects followed-up for ≤5 years, dementia-free subjects, classified as having no cognitive impairment or cognitive impairment, no dementia at baseline, underwent annual neuropsychological assessments including Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Global Cognition Z-scores and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Global Scores (where a ≥ 0.5 increment from baseline denotes functional decline). Mild behavioural impairment was measured using baseline and annual Neuropsychiatric Inventory assessments, while brain atrophy was evaluated using cortical and medial temporal atrophy scores from baseline MRI scans. Baseline serum serotonin was then associated with the neuropsychological and neuroimaging measures cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Furthermore, associations of serum serotonin with cross-sectional brain atrophy scores were studied. Of the 191 elderly subjects included in the study, 63 (33.0%) had no cognitive impairment while 128 (67.0%) had cognitive impairment, no dementia. Fourteen subjects (9.0%) showed baseline mild behavioural impairment. Compared with the highest tertile, subjects within the lowest tertile of serotonin had greater Cortical Atrophy scores (adjusted odds ratio = 2.54, 95% confidence interval=1.22–5.30, P = 0.013). Serotonin levels were not significantly associated with cross-sectional neuropsychological or mild behavioural impairment scores (all P > 0.05). Of the 181 subjects with longitudinal cognitive follow-up (median duration 60.0 months), 56 (30.9%) developed functional decline, while incident mild behavioural impairment occurred in 26/119 (21.8%) subjects. Compared with the highest tertile, lower serotonin levels were associated with higher hazards of functional decline (lowest tertile: adjusted hazards ratio = 2.15, 95% confidence interval = 1.04–4.44, P = 0.039), and incident mild behavioural impairment (lowest tertile: adjusted hazards ratio = 3.82, 95% confidence interval = 1.13–12.87, P = 0.031, middle tertile: adjusted hazards ratio = 3.56, 95% confidence interval =1.05–12.15, P = 0.042). The association between the lowest serotonin tertile and functional decline was mediated via its effect on incident mild behavioural impairment (adjusted odds ratio = 3.96, 95% confidence interval = 1.15–13.61, P = 0.029). In conclusion, low circulating serotonin may be associated with cortical atrophy at baseline, as well as act as an early prognostic marker for functional decline and mild behavioural impairment in elderly, dementia-free subjects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207