Functional outcome of limb sparing surgery of shoulder girdle tumors after free vascularized fibular flap.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To share the functional outcome of free vascularized fibular flap for shoulder reconstruction using Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). Study Design: Descriptive Cross-sectional study. Setting: Burns and Plastic Surgery Center, Peshawar. Period: January 2019 to December 2023. Methods: All the patients presented with biopsy proven sarcoma involving proximal humerus were included in this study. Informed consent for data collection was obtained. Patient data regarding demographics, tumor location, extent of lesion, reconstruction and complications was collected from patient records. Six month follow up was done to assess functional recovery of the patient. Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) was used 6 months post-operatively to assess recovery of the patient using TESS questionnaire. Patient data was analyzed in using an open source software, GNU PSPP version 2.0.0. Results: A total of 11 patients were included in this study. Mean age of the patients was 15±3.5 years. Eight patients (72.7%) were male while 3 (27.3%) were female. Two patients has post-operative bleeding and 1 patient had fracture of fibula. Average TESS score was 61±7.71 years. Eight patients (72.7%) reported a good TESS score while 4 (27.3%) patients scored poor on TESSS Questionnire. Conclusion: Reconstruction of shoulder in sarcoma patients is a complex problem. Both prosthetic and biological reconstructive options present their own set of issues. In our experience, the use of free vascularized fibular flap (FVFF) presents a much better option with lower rate of infection and on average good Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) Scores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".