MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406292454 · doi:10.1002/admi.202400741

Alignment, Rising, Sticking, and Phototaxis: Modulating the Behavior of Hematite Micropeanuts

2025· article· en· W4406292454 on OpenAlexafffund
David P. Rivas, Zameer Hussain Shah, Henry Shum, Sambeeta Das

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Interfaces · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Health Research InstitutesNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsChemical physicsvan der Waals forceMaterials sciencePhototaxisParticle (ecology)Substrate (aquarium)SemiconductorInclined planeHematiteColloidElectric fieldAttractionNanotechnologyPhysicsOptoelectronicsChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial active colloids have been an active area of research in the field of active matter and microrobotic systems. In particular, light driven semi-conductor particles have been shown to display interesting behaviors ranging from phototaxis (movement toward or away from a light source), rising from the substrate, inter-particle attraction, attraction to the substrate, or other phenomenon. However, these observations involve multiple different designs of particles in varying conditions, making it unclear how the experimental parameters, such as pH, peroxide concentration, and light intensity, affect the outcomes. In this work, a peanut-shaped hematite semi-conductor particle was shown to exhibit a rich range of behavior as a function of the experimental conditions. The particles show rising, sticking, phototaxis, and in-plane alignment of their long axes perpendicular to a magnetic field. A theoretical model accounting for gravity, van der Waals forces, electric double layer interactions with the glass surface, and self-diffusiophoresis is formulated to describe the system. Incorporating experimental data for the dependence of various properties on pH and ionic concentrations, the balance of competing effects in the model explains many of the observed behaviors, providing insight into the relevant physical phenomena and how different environmental conditions can lead to such a rich diversity of behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Materials InterfacesSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207