Konsep Diri dan Quarter Life Crisis Pada Mahasiswa Magister
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quarter life crisis merupakan krisis yang dirasakan oleh individu yang berada pada tahap perkembangan emerging adulthood. Quarter life crisis dapat dialami oleh mahasiswa magister yang berada dalam rentang usia yang tergolong emerging adulthood. Salah satu faktor yang mempengaruhi quarter life crisis yaitu konsep diri. Sejauh penelusuran peneliti, saat ini belum ada penelitian yang meneliti mengenai pengaruh konsep diri terhadap quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa magister. Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan untuk mengetahui secara empiris pengaruh konsep diri terhadap quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa magister. Teknik analisis data yang dipakai dalam penelitian ini yaitu teknik analisis data regresi linear sederhana. Kesimpulan penelitian ini yaitu terdapat pengaruh konsep diri terhadap quarter life crisis pada mahasiswa magister. Penelitian ini mengimplikasikan bahwa mahasiswa magister perlu memandang dirinya secara positif sehingga dapat menghadapi quarter life crisis dengan baik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.042 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".