Continuous versus intermittent tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients (Tic Tac)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundTacrolimus is administered via a continuous or intermittent IV infusion to prevent acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Limited comparison data is available.ObjectivesThe primary objective was to compare the proportion of therapeutic tacrolimus trough levels in the first 30 days post-stem cell infusion. Secondary outcomes were prevalence of aGvHD, intra-patient variability (IPV) and safety.Study DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study that included pediatric HSCT recipients between March 1, 2015 and October 31,2021 at BC Childrens Hospital. Adverse events were assessed using the Naranjo scoring tool.ResultsOverall, 60 transplants in 59 patients were included; n = 36 intermittent IV and n = 24 continuous IV. Median proportion of blood levels (intermittent and continuous) within 8-12 ug/L was 38% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.04). IPV was 33% and 31% and aGvHD was 39% and 38% in intermittent and continuous respectively. There was a higher proportion of adverse effects in the intermittent group with the exception of hypomagnesemia.ConclusionsContinuous IV tacrolimus provided a higher proportion of levels within therapeutic range. Neither achieved therapeutic trough levels in more than 56% of transplants. However, there was large intra-patient variability in both groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".