MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406309774 · doi:10.1186/s12883-024-03875-x

Association between risk of ischemic stroke and liver enzymes levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4406309774 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Omnia Samy El-Sayed, Asmaa Zakria Alnajjar, Hazem E. Mohammed, Abdelrahman M. Elettreby, Safiya Ibraheem, Mustafa Abdullah, Mohamed Ahmed Tolba

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Neurology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioInternal medicineStroke (engine)Hazard ratioMeta-analysisNeurologyRelative riskConfidence intervalGastroenterologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic stroke is a major public health concern, contributing significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have suggested that alterations in liver enzymes may be linked to the risk of developing a stroke. However, the relationship between liver enzymes and ischemic stroke remains unclear. To examine the potential role of liver enzymes as biomarkers for ischemic stroke. We systematically searched four databases for articles investigating the association between liver enzymes and ischemic stroke up to March 20th, 2024. Newcastle Ottawa Scale judged the quality of included studies. Risk ratio (RR), hazard ratio (HR), or odds ratio (OR) were extracted and statistically analyzed by RevMan and R software. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessed the certainty of evidence. Increased levels of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) have shown statistically significant association with increased ischemic stroke risk (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: [1.30 to 1.57], P > 0.00001) and (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: [1.22 to 2.10], P = 0.0006), respectively. Conversely, increased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) showed no significant association with ischemic stroke risk (RR: 0.92, 95% CI: [0.68 to 1.24], P = 0.58) and (RR: 1.43, 95% CI: [0.83 to 2.49], P = 0.20), respectively. The evidence for all outcomes had a low or very low level of certainty. GGT and ALP could be potential biomarkers for increased ischemic stroke risk, which necessitates careful follow-up. However, AST and ALT did not show such association. The relationship between liver enzymes and ischemic stroke risk is still unclear. We systematically reviewed and analyzed previously published cohort and case control studies. A significant positive association was found between levels of GGT and ALP enzymes with ischemic stroke risk. No significant association was found between ALT and AST enzymes levels with ischemic stroke risk. Further studies are still needed to investigate the causal relationship between different levels of liver enzymes and the risk of ischemic stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC NeurologySame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207