MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406319035 · doi:10.71000/jcz83r08

FAMILY PLANNING EFFECTS ON MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH IN PAKISTAN- A NARRATIVE REVIEW

2025· review· en· W4406319035 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naheed Shah, Nosheen Jehajo, Hafiz Moazam Hussain

Bibliographic record

VenueInsights-Journal of Health and Rehabilitation · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeDevelopmental psychologyPsychologyMaternal healthNarrative reviewEnvironmental healthMedicineHistoryPsychotherapistArtHealth servicesLiteraturePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Family planning is a cornerstone of reproductive health, contributing significantly to improved maternal and child health outcomes. In Pakistan, where high population growth, limited healthcare infrastructure, and socio-cultural barriers persist, the role of family planning is pivotal in reducing maternal and infant mortality, enhancing birth spacing, and improving overall health indicators. Despite its importance, challenges such as gender inequality, socio-religious norms, and inadequate healthcare services limit its adoption and effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate the impact of family planning on maternal and child health outcomes in Pakistan, including contraceptive use, maternal and infant mortality, birth spacing, and childhood illnesses. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, alongside manual reference searches. Studies conducted in Pakistan, published in English, and focusing on family planning's impact on maternal and child health outcomes were included. Data extraction encompassed study characteristics, family planning interventions, maternal and child health outcomes, and key findings. Quality assessment tools such as the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were employed to evaluate methodological rigor. Data synthesis was performed narratively, and meta-analysis was conducted where feasible to summarize quantitative findings. Results: Family planning interventions demonstrated significant benefits, including reductions in maternal and infant mortality, healthier birth spacing, and lower rates of childhood illnesses. Contraceptive use improved maternal health outcomes by preventing high-risk pregnancies and reducing complications. However, socio-cultural barriers, limited healthcare access, and unmet contraceptive needs were identified as persistent challenges. Conclusion: Family planning has a transformative impact on maternal and child health outcomes in Pakistan. Addressing socio-cultural and healthcare system barriers through integrated strategies and evidence-based policies can enhance its adoption, contributing to improved health and well-being for families nationwide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsights-Journal of Health and RehabilitationSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207