MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406321245 · doi:10.46303/jcve.2024.41

The Pedagogic Role of Indigenous Play for Early-Grade Learners

2024· article· en· W4406321245 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Chukwudi Ekeh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Culture and Values in Education · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous and Place-Based Education
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPsychologyMathematics educationPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preserving cultural heritage, mainly through Indigenous play, is imperative for fostering the younger generation's comprehension of diverse cultural aspects. In the 21st century, shifts in the educational landscape have jeopardised early-grade learners' involvement in Indigenous play in Nigeria, jeopardising the nation's rich multicultural diversity. This research investigates the pedagogic significance of Indigenous play for early-grade learners in the Owerri education zone of Imo State, Nigeria. The study was conducted in the Owerri education zone of Imo State, Nigeria. The setting includes schools, homes, and communities where young learners traditionally engage in Indigenous play. Utilising qualitative methods and a narrative research design, the study explores factors contributing to the decline of Indigenous play through interviews, observations, and literature reviews. The findings reveal decreased Indigenous play, highlighting various game types and benefits crucial for children's physical, socio-emotional, and academic development. Safety concerns, parental emphasis on intellectual development, and social media and technology influence diminish opportunities for early-grade learners to engage in Indigenous play. The research underscores the critical role of Indigenous play, emphasising the adverse effects of its decline and advocating for a balanced education approach prioritising cognitive and affective development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Culture and Values in EducationSame topicIndigenous and Place-Based EducationFrench-language works237,207