MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406321664 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3525410

Diffusion-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Resource Management in Connected Construction Equipment Networks: A Hierarchical Framework

2025· article· en· W4406321664 on OpenAlexaff
Pengfei Ning, Hongwei Wang, Tao Tang, Jie Zhang, Hongyang Du, Dusit Niyato, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersBeijing Jiaotong University
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceDiffusionResource management (computing)Artificial intelligenceComputer networkDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the extensive adoption of information technology, tunnel construction is experiencing a rapid digital transformation. Integrating powerful direct communication among construction equipment (CE) facilitates real-time data exchange, promoting collaborative operations among CE. Concurrent execution of multiple construction procedures leads to a significant rise in the amount of CE and communication links, resulting in resource competition. However, this competition is aimed at enhancing collaboration. To address this inherently contradictory issue, we propose a hierarchical resource management framework and align communication quality of service (QoS) to construction efficiency using construction procedure coherence degree (CPCD) based on age of information (AoI). By formulating resource management as a stochastic optimization problem, a suitable online two-level deep reinforcement learning algorithm referred to as diffusion based soft actor critic (DSAC)-QMIX is designed to derive the radio resource allocation strategies. DSAC is responsible for orchestrating spectrum inter-fleets at the high-level, and QMIX makes the resource management and power control decision for each CE at the low-level. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the DSAC-QMIX algorithm with comparable transmission rate, and show superior performance in terms of CPCD satisfaction compared with other benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207