MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406329325 · doi:10.1002/hbm.70135

Sex‐Specific White Matter Abnormalities Across the Dynamic Pain Connectome in Neuropathic Pain: A Fixel‐Based Analysis Study

2025· article· en· W4406329325 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily P. Mills, Rachael L. Bosma, Anton Rogachov, Joshua C. Cheng, Natalie R. Osborne, Junseok A. Kim, Ariana Besik, Rima El‐Sayed, Anuj Bhatia, Karen D. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Brain Mapping · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Brain InstituteUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMultiple Sclerosis SocietyMultiple Sclerosis Society of CanadaUniversity of TorontoMAYDAY Fund
KeywordsWhite matterNeuroscienceConnectomeThalamusDiffusion MRIDefault mode networkNeuropathic painPsychologySomatosensory systemNociceptionFractional anisotropyMedicineFunctional magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineFunctional connectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A fundamental issue in neuroscience is a lack of understanding regarding the relationship between brain function and the white matter architecture that supports it. Individuals with chronic neuropathic pain (NP) exhibit functional abnormalities throughout brain networks collectively termed the "dynamic pain connectome" (DPC), including the default mode network (DMN), salience network, and ascending nociceptive and descending pain modulation systems. These functional abnormalities are often observed in a sex-dependent fashion. However, the enigmatic white matter structural features underpinning these functional networks and the relationship between structure and function/dysfunction in NP remain poorly understood. Here we used fixel-based analysis of diffusion weighted imaging data in 80 individuals (40 with NP [21 female, 19 male] and 40 sex- and age-matched healthy controls [HCs]) to evaluate white matter microstructure (fiber density [FD]), macrostructure (fiber bundle cross section) and combined microstructure and macrostructure (fiber density and cross section) within anatomical connections that support the DPC. We additionally examined whether there are sex-specific abnormalities in NP white matter structure. We performed fixel-wise and connection-specific mean analyses and found three main ways in which individuals with NP differed from HCs: (1) people with NP exhibited abnormally low FD and FDC within the corona radiata consistent with the ascending nociceptive pathway between the sensory thalamus and primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Furthermore, the entire sensory thalamus-S1 pathway exhibited abnormally low FD and FDC in people with NP, and this effect was driven by the females with NP; (2) females, but not males, with NP had abnormally low FD within the cingulum consistent with the right medial prefrontal cortex-posterior cingulate cortex DMN pathway; and (3) individuals with NP had higher connection-specific mean FDC than HCs in the anterior insula-temporoparietal junction and sensory thalamus-posterior insula pathways. However, sex-specific analyses did not corroborate these connection-specific findings in either females or males with NP. Our findings suggest that females with NP exhibit microstructural and macrostructural white matter abnormalities within the DPC networks including the ascending nociceptive system and DMN. We propose that aberrant white matter structure contributes to or is driven by functional abnormalities associated with NP. Our sex-specific findings highlight the utility and importance of using sex-disaggregated analyses to identify white matter abnormalities in clinical conditions such as chronic pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Brain MappingSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207