Alzheimer's disease classification by supervised and intelligent techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Significant advancements in neuroimaging have emerged over the past decade, notably through positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its precursor, mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Combining imaging modalities with machine learning (ML) techniques enhances diagnostic accuracy. Objective: To develop predictive models using pre-treatment brain imaging data to distinguish between normal controls (NC), MCI, and AD stages, improving diagnostic precision. Methods: We utilized the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database, processing 3D MRI, PET Florbetaben, and PET Flortaucipir images. Techniques included convolutional neural networks (CNN), fuzzy logic, and multi-layer perceptron (MLP). Feature extraction involved amyloid-β volume, tau protein levels, and empty space volumes. Results: The fuzzy logic approach achieved a classification accuracy of 99.1%, outperforming CNN (90.67%) and MLP (94%). Integration of multimodal data significantly enhanced performance compared to single-modality approaches. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that integrating advanced ML techniques with multimodal neuroimaging can effectively classify AD stages. These findings address critical gaps in early detection and provide a foundation for future clinical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".