Restoration of Coniferous Forest and Myodes gapperi: Responses to Thinning, Fertilization, and Succession over a 45-Year Period
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Highlights: We report a 45-year time-line of forest restoration after harvesting and responses of red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi), an indicator species of closed-canopy forests. Background and Objectives: We have a unique long-term window to test four hypotheses that evaluated the relationship of M. gapperi with old forest structural attributes. Materials and Methods: The study began in old-growth lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) through clearcutting, regeneration, stand thinning, fertilization, and growth to mature forest (1979 to 2024) in southern BC, Canada. Populations of red-backed voles were monitored in all phases of forest restoration. Results: Clearcutting resulted in the extirpation of M. gapperi followed by small (≤2 voles/ha) populations in young (13–23 years) thinned and fertilized stands. At age 33, the mean annual abundance of M. gapperi (6.5 to 8.7/ha) was highest in the heavily thinned and old-growth stands. At age 43, mean numbers of M. gapperi ranged from 2.7 to 4.2/ha in these same stands. Heavily thinned stands had large trees, multi-layered canopies of conifers, and understory patchiness. Conclusions: This is the first report of long-term responses of M. gapperi to the restoration of mature forest. M. gapperi is a suitable species for monitoring the recovery of some old forest structural features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".