Multiculturalism and the Experiences of Visible Minority Immigrant Women in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay examines of multiculturalism in Canada’s constitution obscures the persistent experiences of racism and discrimination among minority immigrant women.. Immigrant women often confront an impetus to assimilate; resistance to assimilation may result in their cultural values being silenced because they do not conform to the Canadian national identity. Focusing on the period between 1987–2012, this essay will explore the challenges faced by visible minority immigrant women as they undergo settlement in a “multicultural” Canada. It argues that Canadian multiculturalism fails to adequately provide equal opportunities to visible minority immigrant women by overlooking their negative experiences exacerbated by discrimination and structural inequities. Additionally, this essay contends that visible minority immigrant women are neglected by the multicultural framework in Canada, evidenced by disproportionate experiences of challenges to social alienation, cultural preservation, and the paid labour force. This analysis reveals that multicultural policies provide a narrow definition of racism by reducing it to acts of violence against visible minorities. Policy should expand to also encompass the impacts of racial stereotyping and exclusion directed against these women. Therefore, to better address inequities between visible minority immigrant women, Canadian policy makers should address the issue of systemic racism rather than focusing on cultural homogeneity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.053 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".