MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406343855 · doi:10.1503/jpn.240087

Polygenic risk for depression and resting-state functional connectivity of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in young adults

2025· article· en· W4406343855 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu Chen, Huey-Ting Li, Xingguang Luo, Guangfei Li, Jaime S. Ide, Chiang‐Shan R. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsFunctional connectivityAnterior cingulate cortexResting state fMRIDepression (economics)NeurosciencePolygenic risk scoreCortex (anatomy)Cingulate cortexPsychologyMedicineBiologyCognitionCentral nervous systemGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Genetic variants may confer risk for depression by modulating brain structure and function; evidence has underscored the key role of the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) in depression. We sought to examine how the resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the sgACC was associated with polygenic risk for depression in a subclinical population. METHODS: Following published protocols, we computed seed-based whole-brain sgACC rsFC and calculated polygenic risk scores (PRS) using data from healthy young adults from the Human Connectome Project. We performed whole-brain regression against PRS and severity of depression symptoms in a single model for all participants and by sex, controlling for age, sex, race or ethnicity, alcohol use severity, and household income. We evaluated the results at a corrected threshold. RESULTS: We included data for 717 healthy young adults. We found lower rsFC between the sgACC and the default mode network and frontal regions in association with PRS and lower sgACC-cerebellar rsFC in association with depression severity. We also noted differences by sex in the connectivity correlates of PRS and depression severity. In an additional set of analyses, we observed a significant correlation between PRS and somatic complaints, as well as altered sgACC-somatosensory cortical connectivity in association with the severity of somatic complaints. LIMITATIONS: The current findings should be considered specific to subclinical depression and may not generalize to patients with depressive disorders. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the pivotal role of distinct sgACC-based networks in the genetic predisposition for depression and the manifestation of depression among young adults with subclinical depression. Distinguishing the risk from severity markers of depression may have implications in developing early and effective treatments for people at risk for depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Psychiatry and NeuroscienceSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207