Exome sequencing reveals a rare damaging variant in GRIN2C in familial late-onset Alzheimer's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with both genetic and environmental factors contributing to its pathogenesis. While early-onset AD has well-established genetic determinants, the genetic basis for late-onset AD remains less clear. This study investigates a large Italian family with late-onset autosomal dominant AD, identifying a novel rare missense variant in GRIN2C gene associated with the disease, and evaluates the functional impact of this variant. Methods Affected and unaffected members from a Northern Italian family were included. Genomic DNA from family members was extracted and initially screened for pathogenic mutations in APP , PSEN1 , and PSEN2 , and screened for 77 genes associated with neurodegenerative conditions using NeuroX array assay. Exome sequencing was performed on three affected individuals and two healthy relatives. Bioinformatics analyses were conducted. Functional analysis was performed using primary neuronal cultures, and the impact of the variant was assessed through immunocytochemistry and electrophysiology. Results Pathogenic variants were not identified in APP , PSEN1 , or PSEN2 , nor in the 77 genes in NeuroX array assay. Exome Sequencing revealed the c.3215C > T p.(A1072V) variant in GRIN2C gene (NM 000835.6), encoding for the glutamate ionotropic receptor N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) type subunit 2C (GluN2C). This variant segregated in 6 available AD patients in the family and was absent in 9 healthy relatives. Primary rat hippocampal neurons overexpressing GluN2C A1072V showed an increase in NMDAR-induced currents, suggesting altered glutamatergic transmission. Surface expression assays demonstrated an elevated surface/total ratio of the mutant GluN2C, correlating with the increased NMDAR current. Additionally, immunocytochemistry revealed in neurons expressing the mutant variant a reduced colocalization between the GluN2C subunit and 14-3-3 proteins, which are known to facilitate membrane trafficking of NMDARs. Discussion We identified a rare missense variant in GRIN2C associated with late-onset autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. These findings highlight the role of GluN2C-containing NMDARs in glutamatergic signaling and their potential contribution to AD pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".