MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406357953 · doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02282-3

Integrating the A2DS2 Score with 24-Hour ASPECTS and red cell distribution width for enhanced prediction of stroke-associated pneumonia following intravenous thrombolysis: model development and internal validation

2025· article· en· W4406357953 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarawut Krongsut, Nat Na-Ek, Atiwat Soontornpun, Niyada Anusasnee

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean journal of medical research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersThammasat University
KeywordsThrombolysisMedicineStroke (engine)PneumoniaRed blood cell distribution widthInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a major cause of mortality during the acute phase of stroke. The A 2 DS 2 score is widely used to predict SAP risk but does not include 24-h non-contrast computed tomography-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (NCCT-ASPECTS) or red cell distribution width (RDW). We aim to evaluate the added prognostic value of incorporating 24-h NCCT-ASPECTS and RDW into the A 2 DS 2 score and to develop a novel prediction model for SAP following thrombolysis. This retrospective cohort study included thrombolyzed AIS patients at Saraburi Hospital, Thailand. The combined A 2 DS 2 -MFP model incorporated 24-h NCCT-ASPECTS and RDW, along with non-linear continuous predictors, using multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) regression. Predictive performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), comparing it with the traditional A 2 DS 2 model and a model with continuous predictors. The goodness of fit for logistic regression models in relation to the observed data was determined through the Hosmer–Lemeshow method, and the accuracy of the probability predictions was examined using a calibration curve. Internal validation was performed using a bootstrapping approach. The predicted probability equation obtained from the final model after optimism correction was developed into a web-based application for predicting the risk of SAP, using PHP and JavaScript. Of 345 AIS patients, 20.3% developed SAP. The combined A 2 DS 2 -MFP model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance (AuROC: 0.917) compared to the traditional A 2 DS 2 model (AuROC: 0.868) and the model with continuous predictors (AuROC: 0.888). Both the calibration curve and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated that the predicted probabilities and observed frequencies were in acceptable agreement. Incorporating 24-h NCCT-ASPECTS and RDW significantly improved risk prediction and clinical utility, as shown by improved reclassification indices and DCA. The model was internally validated with a C-statistic of 0.912, confirming its robustness. The combined A 2 DS 2 -MFP calculation showed superior performance, enabling early SAP detection and improving survival outcomes. This novel model offers a practical tool for resource-limited settings, supporting better SAP risk stratification and clinical management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean journal of medical researchSame topicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisFrench-language works237,207